Bet A Lot and Gain Small in Craps
If you choose to use this approach you really want to have a very large amount of cash and superior fortitude to march away when you achieve a small win. For the purposes of this story, an example buy in of two thousand dollars is used.
The Horn Bet numbers are certainly not looked at as the "successful way to play" and the horn bet itself carries a house edge of over twelve percent.
All you are wagering is $5 on the pass line and ONE number from the horn. It does not matter whether it is a "craps" or "yo" as long as you gamble it at all times. The Yo is more popular with people using this system for apparent reasons.
Buy in for $2,000 when you join the table but put only $5.00 on the passline and $1 on one of the 2, three, 11, or 12. If it wins, awesome, if it loses press to $2. If it loses again, press to four dollars and then to eight dollars, then to $16 and following that add a one dollar every subsequent wager. Each time you lose, bet the previous bet plus an additional dollar.
Adopting this scheme, if for example after 15 tosses, the number you bet on (11) has not been tosses, you probably should march away. However, this is what could develop.
On the 10th toss, you have a total of one hundred and twenty six dollars in the game and the YO at long last hits, you come away with $315 with a profit of one hundred and eighty nine dollars. Now is a great time to go away as it is higher than what you entered the game with.
If the YO does not hit until the twentieth roll, you will have a total wager of $391 and seeing as current wager is at $31, you amass $465 with your profit being $74.
As you can see, adopting this system with just a one dollar "press," your profit margin becomes smaller the more you bet on without attaining a win. This is why you have to march away after a win or you have to bet a "full press" again and then carry on with the $1.00 increase with each toss.
Carefully go over the data before you try this so you are very adept at when this approach becomes a losing proposition instead of a profitable one.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
